Anthony Gayton, The Angelus, 'No.4 AIR'

Reg Speller, A policewoman chases a group of young skinny-dippers at the Hyde Park lido (1926)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by julio! (@julio.lostlands)

Freddie Woodward juggling to relax between dives during a competition in Southend-on-Sea in 2014

When Ru says ‘you’re a twin, I want him on the show’… Well, we get him on the show!! 😂🇬🇧💅🏼🏁💄
Let’s go @JGI_94

Such a fun time shooting this week’s episode with my twin. Tune in tonight to watch us dancing about in our pants @dragraceukbbc #britcrew #pitcrew #DragRaceUK pic.twitter.com/di87ZMlQXR

— THOMAS INGE (@thomasinge_) November 7, 2024

Who is lobbying to raise taxes in the UK? (Part 6)

Yes, really!

Who are Group 4's biggest clients?

Group 4 (later Group 4 Securicor, then G4S) primarily served a mix of government/public sector clients and large private-sector organizations. As one of the world's largest private security firms during Jørgen Philip-Sørensen's era (especially from the 1960s–2000s), its revenue came heavily from manned guarding, cash handling, prison/custodial services, and facility security. Governments and major corporates formed the backbone of its client base.

Major Government/Public Sector Clients (Biggest by Scale and Visibility)

Governments were among the largest and most consistent clients, particularly in the UK and internationally, accounting for a significant portion of revenue (often 20–25% globally in later years, with UK public sector work historically prominent).

• UK Government departments and agencies — Including the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (electronic tagging/monitoring of offenders, prison management), Government Property Agency (GPA) (security for dozens of departmental buildings in London and the North), Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) (front-of-house and security services), Ministry of Defence (MoD) (security at over 200 sites), and others like police forces (e.g., Lincolnshire Police had a large £200m+ contract). G4S also ran multiple UK prisons (e.g., Altcourse, Oakwood, Parc, Rye Hill) and provided services at airports, ports, hospitals, and schools.
• US Government — Contracts with the Department of State (local guard services at US embassies worldwide, worth tens to hundreds of millions), Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) (detainee transportation and related services, over $1 billion cumulatively in some periods), and other federal work.
• Other international governments — Security for embassies (over 40 worldwide), prison operations (e.g., Mangaung Correctional Centre in South Africa), and services in countries across Europe, Africa, and beyond. G4S also supported events like the 2012 London Olympics.

Major Private-Sector Clients

Around 70–80% of G4S/Group 4 business was with the private sector, focused on "major corporates & industrials," financial institutions, retail, and energy/utilities.

• Financial institutions and banks — Cash handling, secure logistics, and guarding services were core (e.g., Bank of America noted as a large individual customer in some reports). Central banks and retailers also relied on its cash solutions division.
• Retail, energy, transport, and industrials — Large contracts for manned security, risk consulting, and facility protection. Examples include FTSE 100 companies and sectors like oil/gas infrastructure, airports/ports, and leisure/tourism.
• Other notables — Corporate clients in telecommunications (e.g., Bharti Airtel), and general industrial/commercial guarding.

Context on Scale and Evolution

• Revenue split (approximate in G4S's later years): ~35% from major corporates & industrials, ~21% from government (including care/justice services like prisons at ~7%), ~16% from financial institutions, with the rest from retail, energy, etc. Cash solutions (secure transport/handling) and secure solutions (guarding/tech) were the main pillars.
• During the Group 4 era under Philip-Sørensen (pre- and early post-mergers in 2000–2004), the focus was heavily on UK and European expansion, with government and commercial guarding as key growth drivers. The company grew through organic expansion and acquisitions, becoming a leader in manned security.
• Many contracts were long-term but faced scrutiny (e.g., overcharging scandals on UK tagging, prison performance issues leading to lost contracts like Birmingham Prison). G4S was acquired by Allied Universal in 2021, so current operations fall under that entity.

Exact "biggest by revenue" figures for specific clients are not always publicly broken down due to commercial sensitivity, but governments (especially UK and US) and large banks/financial firms consistently ranked among the top. Private-sector clients provided volume and stability, while government work often involved high-profile, specialized services like prisons and embassy security.

For the most current details, G4S/Allied Universal annual reports or government procurement databases (e.g., UK Contracts Finder or USASpending.gov) offer contract-level insights.

"I'm not a libertarian, but..."

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Neale Williams (@neale.williams.92)

Who is lobbying to raise taxes in the UK? (Part 5)

Yes, really!

Where did Louisa Mann's father's money come from?

Jørgen Philip-Sørensen (1938–2010), Louisa Mann's father, built his substantial fortune primarily through the private security industry, as the driving force behind what became one of the world's largest security companies, ultimately part of G4S.

Family Business Origins

The roots trace back to his grandfather, Julius Philip-Sørensen, who became involved in security services in Scandinavia as early as around 1915–1934 (with the family establishing Securitas AB in Sweden). His father, Erik Philip-Sørensen, continued and expanded the business.

Jørgen (Niels Jørgen Philip-Sørensen) was born in Malmö, Sweden, to a family of Danish ancestry. In the 1960s, he was sent from Scandinavia to the UK (and earlier to Belgium) to develop the family's international operations. In 1965, he became managing director of the UK business, and by 1968, he rebranded and grew it into Group 4 Total Security (based in Worcestershire, England).

Growth and Key Milestones

• He started at the ground level (including time as a security guard) and rapidly expanded the company through organic growth and acquisitions.
• In 1974, he and his brother Sven took over the family business from their father (valued at around $100 million at the time).
• In 1981, the brothers split the operations due to disagreements: Jørgen took the international/European side under the Group 4 name (100% ownership of that arm), while Sven retained the Swedish Securitas operations.
• Jørgen built Group 4 into a major global player. In 2000, it merged with the Danish Falck group (forming Group 4 Falck), where he became chairman and a major shareholder (initially around 30%).
• In 2004, Group 4 Falck merged with the UK-based Securicor, creating Group 4 Securicor (later rebranded G4S), at one point the world's largest private security firm with hundreds of thousands of employees across dozens of countries. He served as chairman until retiring in 2006 (remaining President Emeritus).

His wealth came from ownership stakes in these companies. At various points, estimates placed his fortune in the hundreds of millions of pounds (e.g., £620m–£650m in UK rich lists around 2008–2009, with a major G4S shareholding worth £300m+ even after some sales). Forbes estimated around $850 million–$1.5 billion in the mid-2000s.

Other Investments

While security services were the core source, he diversified into areas such as:

• Hotels (e.g., Dormy House in the Cotswolds)
• The Farncombe Estate (a conference and adult learning centre)
• Yachting-related businesses (he was an avid sailor)
• Ecover (eco-friendly cleaning products)
• Other ventures like a shipyard and food distribution in Denmark.

In summary, the money Louisa Mann and her siblings inherited stemmed overwhelmingly from three generations of family entrepreneurship in private security services, with Jørgen Philip-Sørensen as the key figure who internationalized and scaled Group 4 into a global giant through leadership, mergers, and growth in the UK and beyond. The family business had Scandinavian origins dating back a century, but his stewardship in the UK and internationally generated the bulk of the later wealth. He died in 2010 after a long illness.

Antipodean Trauma

Monarchy considers man in his ties with society; a republic considers man independently of his relations to society.

Louis de Bonald

The only flag that is inclusive enough to include everyone equally irrespective of race, creed, or sexual orientation. And even republicans.

Who is lobbying to raise taxes in the UK? (Part 4)

Yes, really!

Where does Thirty Percy's funding come from?

Thirty Percy Foundation's funding ultimately originates from inherited family wealth, managed through a purpose-driven single-family office called Skagen Conscience Capital. It is not an endowed foundation with a permanent investment pot that generates ongoing income; instead, it operates as a spend-down (or "time-limited") foundation that distributes its finite resources and plans to close in 2030.

Primary Source: The Owl Trust and Family Wealth

• The foundation is funded by a charitable purpose trust known as The Owl Trust, which provided an initial grant (payable over time) to establish and support Thirty Percy.
• This wealth traces back to the family of Louisa Mann (née Anna Louisa Philip Mann), who serves as Chair of Trustees, and her siblings. Louisa has publicly described how she and her siblings were "plunged into the role of stewarding significant wealth" after their father's death about 15 years ago. She and family members (including connections to Mark Philip-Sorensen) are involved in both the foundation and the family office.
• Skagen Conscience Capital (co-founded or directed by family members like Mark Philip-Sorensen) is the vehicle that handles the family's investments and responsible wealth stewardship. Thirty Percy was "borne out of" this family office to formalize and expand their philanthropy, with the office initially providing staff and administrative support.

Recent Income Breakdown (Year Ending 31 March 2025)

According to Charity Commission data:

• Total income: £6,053,051
  • Donations and legacies: £5.91 million (the vast majority — almost entirely from the family-linked trust/structure)
  • Investments: £143,220
  • Negligible amounts from other sources

Expenditure was focused on grants and charitable activities (£5.6 million). No significant public fundraising or external donors are reported; the "donations" are internal transfers from the family's philanthropic structures.

Approach to Wealth and Spending

The family explicitly views this as inherited wealth they are choosing to deploy differently — experimenting with "redefining philanthropy," supporting changemakers directly, and addressing systemic issues like economic rebalancing and tax justice. They emphasize "holding power lightly," unrestricted grants, and spending down the resources rather than preserving the foundation indefinitely. Since 2018, they have invested over £26 million, with more committed before closure.

In short, Thirty Percy is financed almost exclusively by one wealthy UK-based family's inherited assets, channeled through their family office and a dedicated charitable trust. It maintains a relatively low public profile on the exact origins or scale of the underlying wealth (common for family offices), but the connection is clear from official accounts and statements by Louisa Mann. For the most current details, the Charity Commission filings for charity number 1177514 provide the audited financial statements.

Who is Louisa Mann?

Louisa Mann (full name: Anne Louisa Philip Mann) is a British philanthropist, wealth steward, and Chair of Trustees of the Thirty Percy Foundation. She is a member of a wealthy family that inherited significant assets from her father, a successful entrepreneur, and has become known in progressive philanthropy circles for her unconventional, redistribution-oriented approach to inherited wealth.

Background and Family

• She is one of four children (including siblings Anette, Christina, and Mark Philip-Sorensen) from her father’s first marriage to Ingrid.
• Her father was Jørgen Philip-Sørensen (also known as Jorgen Philip Sorensen), a prominent Danish-British businessman and founder of the international security company Group 4 (later part of G4S). He built a substantial fortune through his entrepreneurial ventures.
• When her father died around 15 years ago (circa 2010–2011), Louisa and her siblings were suddenly thrust into stewarding the family’s significant wealth. Prior to that, she had largely focused on raising her four sons and was somewhat distanced from the family business.

Role in Philanthropy and Wealth Management

• Thirty Percy Foundation: Louisa serves as Chair of Trustees. She was instrumental in establishing the foundation (charity number 1177514, set up in 2018/2019) as a vehicle to formalize and expand the family’s giving. It operates as a time-limited “spend-down” foundation that plans to close in 2030, emphasizing bold, unrestricted grants to changemakers, radical experimentation in philanthropy, and addressing systemic issues like economic inequality, climate, and tax justice.
• Skagen Conscience Capital: She has been a director of this single-family office (which manages the family’s investments and purpose-driven wealth stewardship). The family office supported the early operations of Thirty Percy. She stepped down as a director of the company in late 2024.
• Her philosophy: Louisa openly describes questioning traditional “wealth protection mindsets” in both wealth management and philanthropy. She critiques conventional approaches as potential “comfort blankets” that can justify inequality and has advocated for more redistributive, experimental models — including support for campaigns like wealth taxation. She frames her work as reimagining the legacy of her inheritance rather than preserving it indefinitely.

Public Profile

She is often described in philanthropic spaces as the “go-to aunty in the wealth holder space,” noted for her “big heart and rebellious streak.” She has written and spoken about her personal journey — from hesitation about setting up a foundation to challenging norms around individualism, competition, and risk aversion in giving. She contributes to discussions on narrative change in philanthropy and has participated in events focused on wealth holders rejecting or rethinking “extreme wealth.”

In summary, Louisa Mann is a key figure in a family that inherited wealth from a major security industry entrepreneur. She has channeled that into progressive, time-bound philanthropy through Thirty Percy, emphasizing innovation, direct support for activists, and systemic economic reform over traditional models of wealth preservation. She maintains a relatively low public profile outside specialist philanthropy and wealth-holder networks.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by LBC Radio (@lbc)

Who is lobbying to raise taxes in the UK? (Part 3)

What is Thirty Percy?

Thirty Percy Foundation (charity number 1177514) is a small, independent UK philanthropic foundation established in 2019. It describes itself as an organization that "invests differently," aiming to redefine philanthropy by focusing on bold, experimental approaches to funding social and environmental change.

Mission and Approach

Its stated goal is to contribute to the "future security and wellbeing of our world" through sustainable development, education on environmental issues, and support for changemakers. Unlike traditional foundations that often fund specific projects with heavy restrictions, Thirty Percy emphasizes:

• Unrestricted, flexible funding — often direct grants to individuals (e.g., activists, artists, thinkers, and social justice leaders) rather than organizations or rigid programs. Typical individual grants range from £70,000 to £150,000 over 2–3 years.
• Collaboration and innovation — It positions itself as a partner to grantees, experimenting with new models of giving, "holding power lightly," and challenging conventional philanthropy norms.
• Focus areas — Include rebalancing economies, racial justice, climate and environmental work, new economics, place-based initiatives, and tax justice/wealth taxation. It has supported campaigns for taxing extreme wealth and reforming tax structures for the super-rich.

The foundation was born out of the Skagen Conscience Capital family office (a purpose-driven wealth management entity). It emerged from a family’s inherited wealth, with early leadership and exploration involving Louisa Mann (current Chair of Trustees) and others in the family circle. Trustees and team members often come from backgrounds in wealth, law, activism, and social change.

Scale and Plans

• Since around 2018, it has invested over £26 million, with £8 million more committed and plans to deploy an additional £11 million before closing.
• It has announced it will intentionally close in 2030. The rationale is to spend down its resources for maximum immediate impact, avoid perpetuating institutional philanthropy indefinitely, and model a "generative ending" that leaves behind tools, knowledge, partnerships, and provocations for others.
• Recent income (year ending March 2025) was around £6 million, mostly from donations and legacies, with charitable spending of about £5.6 million.

Connection to Tax Justice UK

In spring 2024, Thirty Percy began funding in the UK tax justice space. It provided £400,000 in flexible core funding (2024–2028) plus an additional £40,000 for strategy development — one of the largest single commitments to the organization. This aligns with Thirty Percy’s interest in economic rebalancing and supporting reforms to tax the wealthiest more heavily.

In summary, Thirty Percy is a progressive, time-limited foundation that uses family wealth to experiment with more radical, people-centered philanthropy, with a particular recent interest in tax reform and inequality issues. Its website (thirtypercy.org) and Medium blog ("Thirty Percy — the final years") provide more on its philosophy, grants, and reflections. Like many such funders, it maintains a relatively low public profile on exact family details while being transparent about its grant-making approach.